MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129389632 · doi:10.1109/ccece.1995.526590

Departure process characterization of the leaky bucket with modified geometric mode

2002· article· en· W2129389632 on OpenAlexaff
Y. Chen, Jun Steed Huang, J.F. Hayes, M. Mehmet Ali

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAdvanced Queuing Theory Analysis
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBurstinessLeaky bucketSmoothingComputer scienceToken bucketProcess (computing)Queueing theoryReal-time computingComputer networkNetwork packet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An ATM network is expected to support a large number of bursty traffic sources, and therefore, it is critical to control the network traffic in order to provide a desirable level of performance. The "leaky bucket" scheme is a typical policing or usage parameter control (UPC) mechanism in ATM networks. We build a modified geometric model (MGeo) for the interdeparture time distribution of the leaky bucket. The control effects of leaky bucket are extensively examined, from the viewpoint of smoothing out the burstiness of the input traffic, with numerical examples. The smoothing effect is reflected by the squared coefficient of variation (SCV) of the interdeparture time of the departure process from the leaky bucket. We offer a procedure to fit the interdeparture time distribution of the leaky bucket to the MGeo model. We also provide simulation results to verify the model. The trade-off between the burstiness of the departure process and the cell delay is examined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Queuing Theory AnalysisFrench-language works237,207