Synthesis, characterization and hydrolytic stability of diorganotin(IV)bis(<i>O</i>-alkyl alkylphosphonate)s
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diorganotinbis(O-alkyl alkylphosphonate)s, R2Sn(O2P(OR1)R1)2 [R1 = Me, R = Me (1), Et (2), n-Bu (3); R1 = Et, R = Me (4), Et (5), n-Bu (6)] have been synthesized from the reaction between dimethyl/diethyl/di-n-butyltin dichloride and dialkyl alkylphosphonates, (R1O)2P(O)R1, in a solvent-free medium (120 °C, 18 h). X-ray crystal structure of 1 reveals two independent molecules in the unit cell that form one-dimensional polymeric motifs by virtue of bridging bidentate phosphonate groups. The structural attribute of each polymeric chain represents an orderly infinite array of -[Sn-O-P-O-]2 8-membered puckered cyclic rings with hexa-coordinated tin atoms. The structure of 2 resembles that of 1 and exhibits nearly identical structural parameters. The presence of C–H···O hydrogen bonding interactions involving P-OMe and (or) phosphonate (P=O) groups in both 1 and 2 afford the formation of two- and three-dimensional structural motifs, respectively. The phase purity and structural integrity of the bulk sample of 1 upon exposure to water has been ascertained by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). All the compounds reported herein have been characterized by IR and multinuclear (1H, 13C, 31P, 119Sn) NMR spectral studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".