Gas mixing in a turbulent fluidized bed reactor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A series of experiments has been conducted to study mixing and hydrodynamic behaviour of a downward facing sparger in a turbulent fluidized bed reactor. Using pressure measurement techniques, two flow discharge modes were identified around the sparger by injecting a gas tracer into the bed. These are bubbling and jetting conditions. Experimental results show that, under bubbling conditions, bubbles tend to keep their identity, while under jetting conditions a highly turbulent heterogeneous area is formed around the injection point. Due to attrition and erosion of internal heating or cooling surfaces in industrial reactors, the dominant discharge mode is the bubbling pattern. Therefore, in this investigation, the bubbling pattern is studied by measuring the radial and axial dispersion of gas tracer injected to a hot fluidized bed reactor of 20 cm diameter of FCC and sand particles. A three‐phase model is also proposed in order to predict the mixing length. In addition, the effect of sparger configuration on tracer gas mixing was examined for FCC particles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".