MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129439397 · doi:10.1109/tadvp.2007.898627

Algorithmic Approach for Thermal Port Definition

2007· article· en· W2129439397 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Advanced Packaging · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat Transfer and Optimization
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermalPort (circuit theory)Component (thermodynamics)Interface (matter)Computer scienceThermal analysisAlgorithmElectronic engineeringEngineeringParallel computingPhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An algorithmic technique is presented that allows estimation of maximum temperature rise in a thermal model with component-board thermal interaction. The technique is based on a generalized thermal port grouping to estimate the interface temperature profile derived from coarse port assignments. By using a very simple environment, it takes a library-type thermal component model with many thermal ports included and transforms it by grouping thermal ports based on a temperature profile, allowing a minimal number of port groups to provide the same accuracy as the original model in a shorter time. The usefulness of this technique is illustrated through simulation of two thermal models with extreme nonuniform temperature distribution on the interface surface. The prediction accuracy is evaluated by comparison with the final solutions to numerical simulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.845
Threshold uncertainty score0.757

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it