Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article se penche sur le récent phénomène du reggaetón à l’intérieur de la société cubaine contemporaine et révolutionnaire en offrant une compréhension qui va au-delà d’une représentation de la culture hip-hop en tant que modèle dichotomique de résistance versus subordination. Pourquoi les éducateurs en arts et des promoteurs naturels s’impliquent-ils auprès des jeunes rappeurs et reggaetoneros ? Quels sont les principes de base de leurs enseignements à l’intérieur d’ateliers musicaux offerts par deux Maisons de la culture de Santiago de Cuba ? Ces questions clés nous permettent de constater la présence de forces dominantes, alternatives et émergentes dans le discours des intervenants. Tout en encourageant les jeunes rappeurs et reggaetoneros à développer une forme d’expression authentiquement cubaine, ils rêvent silencieusement que leurs efforts porteront fruits dans l’industrie musicale commerciale. Voilà la double morale exprimée par les intervenants de l’État, une articulation idéologique représentative des dynamiques exprimées par la population cubaine en général.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".