MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129486971 · doi:10.1051/medsci/20031910960

Génétique de la schizophrénie et de la maladie bipolaire

2003· review· fr· W2129486971 on OpenAlexaff
Michel Maziade, Chantal Mérette, Roy Marc-André

Bibliographic record

Venuemédecine/sciences · 2003
Typereview
Languagefr
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Associations and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Bipolar disorderDisappointmentPsychosisLinkage (software)GeneticsPsychologyPsychiatryBiologyGenePsychotherapistCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Results claiming linkage on two chromosomes for schizophrenia (SZ) and bipolar affective disorder (BP) were prematurely published in Nature at the end of the '80s. This ended up into disappointment. The knowledge accumulated from the first generation of unsuccessful molecular genetics studies of SZ and BP provided a stronger basis for the following generation of linkage studies that are now yielding encouraging converging results. Hence, we report several genomics susceptibility loci for SZ and BP, some of them being probably shared by the two major psychiatric illnesses whereas others could be specific to each.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.911
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemédecine/sciencesSame topicGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207