Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les familles lesboparentales sont réputées subversives en ce sens qu’elles contestent la représentation classique de la famille voulant qu’elle soit le fait d’un homme et d’une femme. Au Québec, le débat est présent depuis leur reconnaissance légale en 2002. Aux yeux de certaines personnes, la filiation homoparentale constituerait une dérive dangereuse pour l’ordre social. Cependant, ces familles se situent-elles réellement en marge des normes sociales? Cet article propose d’éclairer le débat à partir de données préliminaires recueillies auprès de mères lesbiennes avec donneur connu. Sous réserve de recherches ultérieures, ce terrain exploratoire a fait émerger des pistes d’interprétation très novatrices. Il est important d’en faire état, car, une fois de plus, la construction des rapports sociaux intra- et extra-familiaux semble plus complexe que les discours souvent normatifs qui l’accompagnent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".