Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis in the Third Millennium: Is There (Yet) Cause for Concern?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To the Editor: I read with great interest the recent editorial on diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) by Dr. Mader1. The author affirms the clinical relevance of this skeletal disorder because of its various complications, some of which are very important in clinical practice (e.g., dysphagia, spinal fracture, spinal lumbar stenosis, neurologic complications, postsurgical heterotopic ossifications, etc). He also emphasizes the need of updating diagnostic criteria (at least 3 sets are used) to obtain a more accurate and timely diagnosis of this condition in its early phases. Dr. Mader is to be congratulated for his interesting paper; however, while defining the still insufficient current diagnostic criteria, he omits comment on possible explanations for this critical diagnostic phase. I would like to express some considerations on the causes of the limited availability of diagnostic tools for DISH. Forestier’s disease, a common name for DISH, particularly in European countries of Latin origin, is an ancient skeletal disorder whose pathologic alterations were described in human skeletons going back to 5000 years ago …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.019 | 0.020 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".