MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129512768 · doi:10.1149/06403.0547ecst

Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells: Characterization and Diagnostics

2014· article· en· W2129512768 on OpenAlexaff
Shankar Raman Dhanushkodi, Maximilian Schwager, Walter Mérida

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProton exchange membrane fuel cellElectrolyteCharacterization (materials science)Materials scienceMembranePolymerDegradation (telecommunications)ElectrodeIn situFuel cellsChemical engineeringComposite materialNanotechnologyChemistryElectronic engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The normal operation of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) can induce significant temperature, humidity, pressure or concentration gradients across the cell’s active area. The overall performance and stability can be affected negatively by these gradients, and they may contribute to material degradation, and ultimately, to cell failure. We report on diagnostic techniques and methodologies to characterize PEMFC material properties and the inhomogeneities across the active area of a working cell. Specifically, we describe in-situ techniques for the spatially-resolved characterization of PEMFC performance. Our testing hardware features sixteen fully isolated segments over a 49 cm 2 active area, reference electrode capabilities, and individual segment control. The techniques are applied to the in-situ characterization of effective platinum surface area (EPSA) degradation under 1×10 5 accelerated stress testing (AST) cycles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.424
Threshold uncertainty score0.410

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.158
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicFuel Cells and Related MaterialsFrench-language works237,207