MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129521256 · doi:10.1109/robio.2004.1521862

A Simple yet Efficient Dynamic System for Robot Path Planning

2005· article· en· W2129521256 on OpenAlexaff
Allan R. Willms, Simon X. Yang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkspaceMotion planningGridComputer scienceRobotPath (computing)Any-angle path planningSimple (philosophy)Occupancy grid mappingGrid referencePoint (geometry)Mobile robotRobot kinematicsAlgorithmMathematical optimizationArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a simple yet efficient dynamic system is proposed for real-time collision-free robot path planning. Like most robot path-planning approaches, the environment is represented by a topologically organized map. Each grid point on the map has only local connections to its neighboring grid points. Thus the computational complexity linearly depends on the number of grid points. Unlike the neural network based path-planning model proposed by Yang and Meng (2001), the proposed algorithm efficiently propagate the distance from the target to the entire robot workspace. Thus the real-time optimal robot path is generated through the dynamic distance landscape without explicitly searching over the global free workspace nor the collision paths, without explicitly optimizing any global cost functions, and without any prior knowledge of the dynamic environment. Therefore the model algorithm is computationally efficient. The effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed dynamic system are demonstrated through simulation and comparison studies

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.530
Threshold uncertainty score0.626

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotic Path Planning AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207