MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129535214

Cardiovascular Fitness of Young Canadian Children with and without Mental Retardation.

2003· article· en· W2129535214 on OpenAlex
Mike Gillespie

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEducation and training in developmental disabilities · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChildren's Physical and Motor Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysical fitnessPsychologyCardiovascular fitnessAerobic exerciseMental healthDevelopmental psychologyGerontologyMulti-stage fitness testClinical psychologyPhysical therapyMedicinePsychiatry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Individuals with mental retardation (MR) typically exhibit lower levels of cardiovascular fitness than their non-disabled peers. However, there seems to be a gap in the literature with respect to comparative studies between younger children with and without MR. The present investigation compared cardiovascular fitness levels of youth with and without MR. Sixty youth (30 with MR, 30 non-disabled) performed a 20-m shuttle run designed to assess cardiovascular fitness. Results indicated that non-disabled children exhibited significantly greater levels of aerobic fitness than did those with MR. Findings illustrate the need for critical examination of physical activity programs for children with MR, as lags in fitness evidenced versus non-disabled peers approximately 50 years ago still exist. The study of health-related physical fitness (HRPF) among persons with mental retarda- tion (MR) is an area that has undergone crit- ical examination over the past half-century. Francis and Rarick (1959) conducted the sem- inal investigation into the HRPF characteris- tics of individuals with MR. They explored fitness and motor performance of children and adolescents with MR concerning the vari- ables of age, gender, and comparison with non-disabled children. The finding concern- ing comparison with non-disabled individuals provided a foundation for future understand- ing of how individuals with MR differentiate in terms of their fitness levels versus non-dis- abled persons. Their overall conclusion in this area has been widely quoted in subsequent works: In general, it can be stated that with the mentally retarded children studied, the means of both boys and girls on most mea- sures were two to four years behind the published age norms of normal children. Furthermore, the discrepancy between the normal and mentally retarded tended to increase with each advancing age level (p. 810). In the almost 50 years since Francis and Rarick (1959) established that individuals with MR are delayed when compared to their non-

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it