MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129566440 · doi:10.1093/glycob/cwq077

Insight into substrate recognition and catalysis by the human neuraminidase 3 (NEU3) through molecular modeling and site-directed mutagenesis

2010· article· en· W2129566440 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGlycobiology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaAlberta Glycomics Centre
FundersCancer Research Institute
KeywordsBiochemistryNeuraminidaseEnzymeActive siteChemistrySialic acidMutagenesisBinding siteSite-directed mutagenesisStereochemistryMutant

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mammalian neuraminidase (NEU) enzymes are found in diverse cellular compartments. Members of the family, such as NEU2 and NEU1, are cytosolic or lysosomal, while NEU3 and NEU4 are membrane-associated. NEU enzymes that act on substrates in the plasma membrane could modulate cellular signaling, cell surface glycoforms and the composition of plasma membrane glycolipids. Therefore, their substrates and mechanism of action are of interest for discerning their physiological roles. We have studied the structure of the human NEU3 using molecular modeling to predict residues involved in the recognition and hydrolysis of glycolipid substrates. To test the model, we have used site-directed mutagenesis of the recombinant protein. Enzymatic studies of the relative activity of these mutants, as well as their pH profiles and inhibition by 2-deoxy-2,3-dehydro-N-acetylneuraminic acid, are reported. Using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, we confirmed that the enzyme is a retaining exo-sialidase, and we propose that the key catalytic residues of the enzyme consist of the general acid-base D50 and the nucleophilic Y370-E225 pair. Mutations of residues expected to interact directly with the sialic acid N5-acetyl (A160, M87, I105) and C7-C9 glycerol side-chain (E113, Y179, Y181) reduced enzymatic activity. We identified several active mutants of the enzyme which contain modifications at the periphery of the active site. Truncations at the N- or C-terminus of more than 10 residues abolished enzyme activity. We propose a catalytic mechanism consistent with the data and identify residues that contribute to glycolipid recognition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.623

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it