Reversible Lower Motor Neuron Disease: A New Case of a Forgotten Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Motor neuron disease (MND) is mostly associated with an irreversible course. Spontaneous recovery has been rarely reported. Herein described is a case of a spontaneous recovery of a lower motor neuron disease. A 38-year-old man complained of an insidious onset of weakness in the right upper limb that progressed to the lower limbs in 16 months. Physical examination revealed mild dysphonia, dysphagia, fasciculations, global hypotonia without prominent atrophy, proximal and distal tetraparesis. The patient was wheelchair-bound. EMG revealed signs of recent and chronic denervation involving bulbar, axial and appendicular myotomes with abundant pos itive sharp waves and fibrillations potentials in all muscles tested. In two year follow-up, the patient evolved with complete recovery and a new EMG study was completely normal. Reversible MND is a condition rarely reported, but physicians should keep in mind the possibility of its occurrence. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/jnr171w
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".