MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129605626 · doi:10.4141/p05-242

Effect of leaf nitrogen concentration versus CND nutritional balance on shoot density and foliage colour of an established Kentucky bluegrass (<i>Poa pratensis</i> L.) turf

2006· article· en· W2129605626 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Science · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicTurfgrass Adaptation and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaRoyal Society
KeywordsPoa pratensisShootNutrientLoamGrowing seasonMathematicsNitrogenField experimentRandomized block designAnimal scienceBotanyHorticultureAgronomyBiologyChemistryPoaceaeStatisticsSoil waterEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 3-yr field study was conducted in a loam and a sand site to determine the effects of N, P, and K application rates on N status, shoot density and foliage colour of Kentucky bluegrass clippings and to derive critical N values. The experiment was arranged in a completely randomized block design with four replicates and three nutrients, N (0 or 50 to 300 kg ha -1 yr -1 ), P (0 or 21.8 to 87.3 kg P ha -1 yr -1 ), and K (0 or 41.7 to 250 kg K ha -1 yr -1 ), equally broadcast six times per growing season. We examined N concentration values, log-transformed N concentration values, and CND values for compositional nutrient simplexes comprising one (V N1 ), three (V N3 ), five (V N5 ), or 11 (V N11 ) macro- and micro-nutrients. Critical values for N expressions were obtained from linear relationships with targeted visual shoot density and foliage colour ratings that were closely related to each other (R 2 = 0.92). The highest coefficients of determination (0.975 to 0.980) were obtained with V N5 and V N11 . The V N5 values were consistent with literature data and across experimental sites, and were the most successful (99% success) in diagnosing N sufficiency in 328 qualified specimens from commercial sod farms. Compared with raw concentrations, the CND transformation reduced from 0.6 to 0.1 the degree of inter-correlation among nutrients in principal component analysis and was amenable to a χ 2 distribution of CND indices. Using a critical imbalance index (CNDr 2 ) of 5.6as χ 2 value, and a critical CND I N 2 index of 1.5 for a 5-nutrient simplex, we diagnosed as imbalanced 179 qualified specimens of which 110 specimens presented excessively high N level among the 328 qualified specimens in commercial stands. The proposed five-nutrient CND norms proved to be effective in diagnosing N status in Kentucky bluegrass clippings across experimental, literature, and survey data sets. Key words: Plant tissue nutrient diagnosis, DRIS, CND, Kentucky bluegrass nitrogen fertilization, turfgrass shoot density, turfgrass foliage colour

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.166
Threshold uncertainty score0.711

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it