MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129606522 · doi:10.1109/61.847261

An investigation to identify possible sources of electromagnetic field transients responsible for exposures reported in recent epidemiological studies

2000· article· en· W2129606522 on OpenAlexaff
P. Sarma Maruvada, P. Jutras, Mathieu Plante

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicElectromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
Canadian institutionsHydro-Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpidemiologyElectromagnetic fieldField (mathematics)Risk analysis (engineering)Computer scienceOccupational exposureTelecommunicationsReliability engineeringEnvironmental healthEngineeringMedicinePhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The possible link between occupational exposure to high-frequency short-duration electromagnetic field transients and the health of utility workers has been discussed in two epidemiological studies. Questions have been raised, however, on the sources responsible for the exposures reported in these studies. A thorough investigation has therefore been carried out, in the laboratory as well as in the utility work environment. The results indicate that the instrument used in these epidemiological studies is typically responding to the use of hand-held walkie-talkies and mobile radio-communication devices rather than power system switching operations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power DeliverySame topicElectromagnetic Fields and Biological EffectsFrench-language works237,207