Comparison of ultraviolet (UV) radiation intensity between a single lamp and a double lamp in a reactors
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Disinfection of drinking water is a challenging and controversial issue. Chemical and ultraviolet (UV) methods are used to deactivate bacteria. Some of the chemical disinfection causes threats to public health since they produce toxic chemical compounds. Recently, several researchers conducted experiments and mathematical models to deactivate pathogenic bacteria from wastewater and drinking water using UV. The intensity of UV is very effective in deactivating bacteria. The authors compared the radiation intensity of a single and double lamp in a UV reactor for water treatment using computational fluid dynamics. The results indicated that the mean volume emission rate of single lamp and double lamp in the reactor was similar. However, the energy distribution of single lamps was much better than the double lamp in the reactor. The sensitivity analysis using three different UV transmittances (UVT), 70, 80 and 90%, indicated that the increase in % UVT value improved the energy distribution in the UV reactor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it