MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129661673 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20010735

LTE spectrum synthesis in magnetic stellar atmospheres

2001· article· en· W2129661673 on OpenAlexafffund
G. A. Wade, S. Bagnulo, O. Kochukhov, J. D. Landstreet, N. Piskunov, M. J. Stift

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityUniversité de Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaHochschuljubiläumsstiftung der Stadt WienUniversity of TorontoAustrian Science Fund
KeywordsPhysicsMagnetic fieldStellar magnetic fieldAstrophysicsAmplitudeStellar atmosphereComputational physicsStokes parametersStarsDipoleOpticsScattering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the aim of establishing a benchmark for the detailed calculation of the polarised line profiles of magnetic stars, we describe an intercomparison of LTE Stokes profiles calculated using three independent, state-of-the-art magnetic spectrum synthesis codes: Cossam, ı10 and Zeeman2. We find, upon establishing a homogeneous basis for the calculations (identical definitions of the Stokes parameters and the magnetic and stellar reference frames, identical input model stellar atmosphere, identical input atomic data, and identical chemical element abundances and magnetic field distributions), that local and disc-integrated Stokes IQUV profiles of Fe calculated using the three codes agree very well. For the illustrative case of disc-integrated profiles calculated for abundance , dipole magnetic field intensity kG, and projected rotational velocity km s-1, Stokes I profiles (depth ∼40% of the continuum flux Ic) agree to within about 0.05% rms of Ic, Stokes V profiles (full amplitude ∼10% ) to within about 0.02% rms of Ic, and Stokes Q and U profiles (full amplitudes ∼2% ) at the sub-0.01% rms level. These differences are sufficiently small so as to allow for congruent interpretation of the best spectropolarimetric data available, as well as for any data likely to become available during the near future. This indicates that uncertainties in modeling Stokes profiles result overwhelmingly from uncertainties in input atomic and physical data, especially the state and structure of model stellar atmospheres.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.254
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations124
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207