MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129668231 · doi:10.5354/rcdf.v10i0.17354

Desempeños lingüístico, cognitivo y auditivo de un grupo de escolares con trastorno específico del lenguaje

2011· article· es· W2129668231 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mauricio Palma, Isabel Valdés, Tristán Coloma

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Chilena de Fonoaudiología · 2011
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldPsychology
TopicDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpecific language impairmentPsychologyCognitionContext (archaeology)NarrativeHumanitiesDevelopmental psychologyLinguisticsArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Specific language impairment (SLI) is defined as a significant limitation in linguistic abilities that cannot be explained by brain damage, cognitive or motor disabilities. In our context, school children with SLI have not been fully investigated. The aim of this study is to obtain information about linguistic, cognitive and auditory aspects in 25 children with SLI attending year 1 of primary school and in 23 control children without SLI. The evaluation procedures included the Test para evaluar la Gramatica Espanola de A. Toronto, the Evaluacion del Discurso Narrativo (EDNA), the Raven's coloured progressive matrices and an audiometric screening. The results indicate that most of the children with SLI show deficits in the linguistic aspects assessed, specially in narrative speech. On the other hand, a few number of children with SLI presented with difficulties in non-verbal cognitive abilities and/or with hearing deficits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Chilena de FonoaudiologíaSame topicDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyFrench-language works237,207