MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129669043 · doi:10.5430/jbgc.v5n1p1

Nephrostomy in pregnancy a district general hospital experience over five years

2014· article· en· W2129669043 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Anthony Kodzo-Grey Venyo, Christiana Oluwashola Fatola, Dayo Adegbite, Ali Nawaz Khan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biomedical Graphics and Computing · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicKidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPregnancyMedicineGeneral hospitalObstetricsGeneral surgeryNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Obstructed kidney is also termed hydronephrosis. An obstructed kidney produces buildup of urine within thekidney which increases pressure within the kidney. This condition can be a result of several different causes of which pregnancyis one of them. Obstructed kidneys in pregnancy call for relieving by nephrostomy which is a thin, plastic tube (catheter) that isinserted through the skin on the back and into the kidney. It can relieve a build-up of urine in the kidney and prevents the kidneyfrom being damaged. It drains urine directly from one or both kidneys into a collecting bag outside the body. The bag has a tapso it can be emptied. Aims: To find out the rate of nephrostomy tube insertion in pregnant women in North Manchester General Hospital betweenJanuary 2009 – December 2013. To identify problems that emanated from insertion of the nephrostomies. Results: Fifteen patients out of 24,863 deliveries (0.06%) in our catchment area underwent 17 nephrostomy procedures. Allthe nephrostomy insertions were successfully and safely undertaken. There was no immediate complication. The complicationsthat were noted include: subsequent blockage of nephrostomy tubes which required readmission to flush the tubes to renderthem patent, two nephrostomy tubes subsequently fell out which were replaced, there was 1 minor infection which was treatedby oral antibiotics. Surgical causes of obstruction found at post-partum nephrostogram include calculi and ureteric strictureswhich were managed post-partum. All the pregnancies continued to full-term with delivery of normal full-term babies. Conclusions: Percutaneous nephrostomy insertion in the pregnant woman under ultra-sound scan guidance is a safe and effectiveprocedure associated with minimal complications and this allows pregnancy to continue to full term. The fact that theblocked nephostomies could all be flushed easily to unblock the tubes would indicate that if all district nurses are taught how tocarefully flush nephrostomies readmission with blocked nephrostomies would be minimised. Strict adherence to nephrostomyprotocol would partly help reduce complications associated with nephrostomy insertion in pregnancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biomedical Graphics and ComputingSame topicKidney Stones and Urolithiasis TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207