MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129688096 · doi:10.1109/lsp.2011.2140396

Enhanced Seam Carving via Integration of Energy Gradient Functionals

2011· article· en· W2129688096 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Frankovich, Alexander Wong

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Signal Processing Letters · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVisual Attention and Saliency Detection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersMichigan State University
KeywordsSeam carvingRetargetingMaxima and minimaComputer scienceEnergy (signal processing)CarvingArtificial intelligenceComputer visionProcess (computing)Image (mathematics)Pattern recognition (psychology)MathematicsEngineeringStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This letter proposes an improved seam carving approach for content-aware image retargeting. The proposed algorithm extends upon the backward and forward energy cost functionals used in previous seam carving methods by incorporating an energy gradient cost functional in the optimization process. This combined absolute energy cost functional penalizes seam candidates that cross areas of local extrema, which characterizes regions with high concentrations of “important” image detail. Experiments show superior visual quality results using the proposed absolute energy cost functional over existing methods on a variety of images characterized by high image detail concentration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Signal Processing LettersSame topicVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionFrench-language works237,207