MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

WPA Project on Partnerships for Best Practices in Working with Service Users and Carers

2010· article· en· W2129711838 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Helen Herrman

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Psychiatry · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthDignityService (business)Action planEthnic groupEquity (law)NursingMedicinePublic relationsPsychologyPolitical sciencePsychiatryBusinessManagement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The WPA has invited service users and family carers to join in its work as members of a taskforce, recognizing their essential contribution to improving mental health in any country. The taskforce is preparing recommendations for the international mental health community on best practices in working with service users and carers. The project's goals and progress are described here on behalf of the taskforce and its special advisers. The project was established by WPA President Prof. Mario Maj to support the WPA Action Plan for the years 2008 to 2011 1,2 and one of its goals: “Support international and national programmes aiming to protect the human rights of persons with mental disorders; to promote the meaningful involvement of these persons in the planning and implementation of mental health services; to encourage the development of a person-centered practice in psychiatry and medicine; and to promote equity in the access to mental health services for persons of different age, gender, race/ethnicity, religion and socioeconomic status”. Service users and carers up to the present day have the regular experience of stigma and discrimination in the community 3,4, poor access to care for mental and physical health problems 5, and treatment under conditions that rob them of respect and dignity 6,7. Psychiatrists join in calling for their inclusion in decisions related to treatment and rehabilitation, the development and management of services, the building of a research knowledge base, the development of policy, and the resolution of problems at any level, especially social exclusion 8,9,10. In some low-income countries, community-based organizations are collaborating with professionals to work effectively with groups of previously marginalized people (e.g., 11). Service users and their families have an important role in advocacy in order to enhance the reputation of mental health expertise and services as well as that of people with a lived experience of mental ill health. In recent years, users and carers have been involved positively in a range of activities including advocacy for support for research, care and social inclusion, and self-help projects 12,13,14,15. The WPA has cooperated on several levels with different user and carer organizations, as with trialogic symposia at congresses and affiliated memberships, with encouraging results 16. Efforts in several countries to change community attitudes and improve mental health care have produced resolutions and guidelines (e.g., 17–19), but their wide use and the structural changes they call for are yet to be achieved. The taskforce has defined the primary need to develop a unified approach to advocacy for mental health and human rights at country and international levels. Adequate support for mental health services and improvement of mental health in any population require a united voice. Achieving this will need support for the capacity of each group to work effectively in partnership. As service users and family carers typically lack the power to interact equally with professionals and government decision makers, assistance in developing this power is mutually important for them and for the WPA and the wider international mental health community. A draft series of ten recommendations about the changes required begins with the declaration that respecting human rights is the basis of successful partnerships for mental health. The second recommendation is that legislation, policy and clinical practice relevant to the lives and care of people with mental disorders need to be developed in collaboration with users and carers. The series continues with a recommendation that the best clinical care of any person in acute or rehabilitation situations is done in collaboration between the user, the carers and the clinicians. Education, research and quality improvement in mental health care also require this collaboration. Other recommendations include enhancing user and carer empowerment through the development of self-help groups; participation in service planning and management boards and the activities of professional societies; employment of people with mental health disabilities in mental health service provision, user-run community centres and psychosocial clubhouses; and the creation of inclusive local anti-stigma programs. Each country will need specific guidelines to apply these recommendations. The next step is a wide consultation and developing an advisory network to include people and organizations with needed expertise. Consultation will take place with Member Societies and other components of the WPA, with other international organizations and through a series of contacts and group discussions with grassroots people and groups. The taskforce has three members with a background as service user (Bhargavi Davar, India; Sylvester Katontoka, Zambia; and Jan Wallcraft, UK), three with a background as family carer (Diane Froggatt, Canada; Hussain Jafri, Pakistan; and Sigrid Steffen, Austria) and six psychiatrists associated with the WPA (Michaela Amering, Austria; Julian Freidin, Australia; Helen Herrman, Australia - Chair; Solomon Rataemane, South Africa; Henrik Wahlberg, Sweden; and Richard Warner, USA). The members were appointed as individuals, although several also hold leadership positions in relevant organizations. Chris Underhill, founder and director of Basic Needs, is special adviser, as are two members of the WPA Committee on Ethics, its Chair Sam Tyano and Afzal Javed. The World Health Organization Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse is helping by offering its experience and advice. The WPA hopes, through the work of the taskforce, to support partnership and participatory developments worldwide, and improve learning from these experiences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.589
Threshold uncertainty score0.916

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.126
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld PsychiatrySame topicFamily Caregiving in Mental IllnessFrench-language works237,207