Bibliographic record
Abstract
Traditional Chinese Culture includes many ecological ideas. This paper studies about some characteristics of them in three aspects. First, the feature that man is an integral part of nature in Traditional Chinese Culture provides potential foundation for harmonic coexistence of man and nature. Second, the concept of “the axes and bills enter the hills and forests only at the proper time” in Traditional Chinese Culture provides a rational basis for harmonic coexistence of man and nature. Third, the orientation of “taking the greatest law so you can live” in Traditional Chinese Culture provides emotional foundation for harmonic coexistence of man and nature Key words: Traditional Chinese Culture, Ecology, Ideology Resume: La culture traditionnelle chinoise comprend pas mal des idees ecologiques. Cette these presente fait une recherche sur ses caracteristiques en trois aspects : Premierement, la nature que l’homme est une part integrale de la nature dans la culture traditionnelle chinoise provient de la fondation potentielle pour la coexistence harmonieuse de l’homme et de la nature. Deuxiement, le concept de « les axes et l’annonce n’entrent dans les montagnes et des forets qu’a un moment juste » dans la culture traditionnelle chinoise fournit une base rationnelle pour la coexistence harmonieuse de l’homme et de la nature ; Troisiemement, l’orientation de « respecter la plus grade loi et tu peux vivre » dans la culture traditionnelle chinoise fournit une fondation emotionnelle pour la coexistence harmonieuse de l’homme et de la nature. Mots-cles: a culture traditionnelle chinois ; l’ecologie, ideologie
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".