Bibliographic record
Abstract
The flow field of a propane-air diffusion flame combustor with interior and exterior conjugate heat transfers was numerically investigated. Solutions obtained from four turbulence models together with a laminar flamelet combustion model, discrete ordinates radiation model and enhanced wall treatment are presented and discussed. The numerical results are compared, in detail, with a comprehensive database obtained from a series of experimental measurements. It is found that the Reynolds stress model (RSM), a second moment closure, illustrates superior performance over three popular two-equation eddy-viscosity models. Although the main flow features are captured by all four turbulence models, only the RSM is able to successfully predict the lengths of both recirculation zones and the turbulence kinetic energy distribution in the combustor chamber. In addition, it provides fairly good predictions for all Reynolds stress components, except for the circumferential normal stress at downstream sections. However, the superiority of the RSM is not so obvious for the temperature and species predictions in comparison with eddy-viscosity models, except for the standard k-ε model. This suggests that coupling between the RSM and combustion models needs to be further improved in order to enhance its applications in practical combustion systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".