MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129743158 · doi:10.1504/ijamc.2009.026853

Reduction of doubtful detection of micro-nucleus in human lymphocyte

2009· article· en· W2129743158 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Domenico Grimaldi, Francesco Lamonaca

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Advanced Media and Communication · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicImage Processing Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeconvolutionComputer scienceFocus (optics)Point spread functionGaussian blurGaussianNoise (video)ComputationWiener filterGaussian noiseGaussian processSpatial reference systemComputer visionNoise reductionMotion blurAlgorithmProcess (computing)Artificial intelligenceImage processingImage (mathematics)Image restorationOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The image correction is proposed by evaluating the Point-Spread Function (PSF) of Wiener's deconvolution for motion blur and Gaussian out of focus alterations. It permits to reduce the number of rejected images for the detection of Micro Nucleuses into lymphocyte images. It operates in conjunction with spatial filters, pointed out to correct bad exposure, Gaussian out of focus and noise. The heavy computation burden suggests to use the Wiener's deconvolution to process the rejected images from spatial filters. To speed-up the correction, the implementation is based on computing distributed service. The criteria to establish the number of PCs is evaluated. This is an expanded version of a paper presented at the 3rd IEEE International Workshop on Medical Measurements and Applications, 9?10 May 2008, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Advanced Media and CommunicationSame topicImage Processing Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207