Work–Family Conflict and Family–Work Conflict as Predictors of Psychological Strain: Does Social Support Matter?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the role of social support in moderating the impact of three forms of work-to-family conflict and family-to-work conflict—time-based conflict, behaviour-based conflict and strain-based conflict on psychological strain experiences of Australian social workers. Data were collected from members of a social work professional body, using an online survey. Four hundred and thirty-nine responses were used for analysis. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis was used to test the moderating effects of social support on the relationship between work–family conflict and psychological strain. Of the eighteen models tested for moderator effects, only one model for family support was significant. The models involving supervisor support and colleague support showed no moderator effects. The findings suggest the need for social workers, their workplaces and the social work professional body to better understand the nature of work–family conflict experienced by social workers in order to identify other ways for supporting them.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it