MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129745413 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2005.1464520

Concentrator Access Networks for Programmable Logic Cores on SoCs

2005· article· en· W2129745413 on OpenAlex
B.R. Quinton, Steven J. E. Wilton

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLow-power high-performance VLSI design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConcentratorProgrammable logic deviceComputer scienceSimple programmable logic deviceProgrammable logic arrayProgrammable Array LogicLogic synthesisErasable programmable logic deviceLogic gateEmbedded systemComputer architectureTelecommunicationsLogic family

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The inclusion of programmable logic cores in modern SoC motivates the need for an access network to make full use of this resource. The programmable nature of these cores removes the requirement of input/output ordering on this access network. Theoretical work on a class of unordered networks called concentrators has shown that as these networks become large, they have a lower cost than ordered or permutation networks. However, currently known constructions of concentrator networks are not lower cost than permutation networks for the entire range of networks of the size required for SoC. This paper demonstrates the differences in the cost and depth of concentrator and permutation networks. It also presents a new construction of a concentrator network that has lower cost and depth than a permutation network for all configurations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.721
Threshold uncertainty score0.617

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLow-power high-performance VLSI designFrench-language works237,207