MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129771257 · doi:10.1109/icc.2006.255634

A Protocol for Interactive Streaming of Image-Based Scenes over Wireless Ad-hoc Networks

2006· article· en· W2129771257 on OpenAlexaff
Azzedine Boukerche, Tingxue Huang, Richard W. Pazzi

Bibliographic record

Venue2006 IEEE International Conference on Communications · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Coding and Compression Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceWireless ad hoc networkRendering (computer graphics)Computer networkMobile ad hoc networkMultimediaMobile deviceReal Time Streaming ProtocolMobile computingWirelessThe InternetNetwork packetComputer graphics (images)World Wide WebTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mobile computing devices with communication capabilities such as PDAs and cell phones are very popular and can be used as an ad-hoc network to interconnect users and services. The visualization of 3D scenes has many interesting applications, for instance, virtual guide, virtual mall, gaming, training, and monitoring. In this paper we focus on how to merge these technologies to stream interactive virtual environments to remote thin clients over ad-hoc networks, while minimizing the overhead. Mobile ad hoc networks poses significant challenges to multimedia streaming, mainly due to the mobility induced changes in bandwidth. We propose a protocol for interactive streaming of image-based rendered scenes which, different from the traditional geometry rendering schemes, is based on images to render photo-realistic views, that proved to be very suitable for such mobile devices. We also propose an image-based representation of 3D scenes and its packetization scheme, and a feedback mechanism to adapt the traffic to the frequent changes in bandwidth, and thus improving the performance of our streaming system. Besides presenting our proposed interactive streaming system, we also discuss the results of the simulation experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.951
Threshold uncertainty score0.618

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2006 IEEE International Conference on CommunicationsSame topicVideo Coding and Compression TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207