Femoral Nerve Palsy in Pavlik Harness Treatment for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transient femoral nerve palsy is a potential complication of the use of a Pavlik harness to treat developmental dysplasia of the hip. Our hypothesis was that patients who develop a femoral nerve palsy while undergoing Pavlik harness treatment for developmental dysplasia of the hip are more likely to have unsuccessful orthotic treatment and to require closed or open hip reduction. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent Pavlik harness treatment for developmental dysplasia of the hip within a seventeen-year period (1992 to 2008). All cases of femoral nerve palsy were identified and reviewed. Thirty infants met the study criteria and formed the palsy group. A control group of seventy-nine infants who did not develop femoral nerve palsy during treatment was randomly selected. RESULTS: Thirty cases of femoral nerve palsy were identified from a group of 1218 patients for an incidence of 2.5%. Eighty-seven percent of femoral nerve palsies presented within one week of application of the Pavlik harness. Femoral nerve palsy was more likely in older, larger patients in whom the developmental dysplasia of the hip was of higher severity. Patients whose femoral nerve palsy resolved within three days had a 70% chance of having successful treatment with the Pavlik harness, whereas those who had not recovered by ten days had a 70% chance of having treatment failure with the Pavlik harness. The success rate associated with treatment with a Pavlik harness was 94% in our control group and 47% in our palsy group. CONCLUSIONS: Femoral nerve palsy is an uncommon yet clinically important complication of Pavlik harness treatment for developmental dysplasia of the hip. This complication is strongly predictive of failure of treatment, and its impact is greatest when the developmental dysplasia of the hip is higher in severity. Early recognition and management of femoral nerve palsies may improve the success of treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".