Automated modeling and robotic grasping of unknown three-dimensional objects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper describes the development of a novel vision-based modeling and grasping system for three-dimensional (3D) objects whose shape and location are unknown a priori. Our approach integrates online computer vision-based 3D object modeling with online 3D grasp planning and execution. A single wrist-mounted video camera is moved around the stationary object to obtain images from multiple viewpoints. Object silhouettes are extracted from these images and used to form a 3D solid model of the object. To refine the model, the object's top surface is modeled by scanning with a wrist-mounted line laser while recording images. The laser line in each image is used to form a 3D surface model that is combined with the silhouette result. The grasp planning algorithm is designed for the parallel-jaw grippers that are commonly used in industry. The algorithm analyses the solid model, generates a robust force closure grasp, and outputs the required gripper position and orientation for grasping the object. The robot then automatically picks up the object. Experiments are performed with two real-world 3D objects, a metal bracket and a hex nut. The shape, position and orientation of the objects are not known by the system a priori. The time required to compute an object model and plan a grasp was less than 4 s for each object. The experimental results demonstrate that the automated grasping system can obtain suitable models and generate successful grasps, even when the objects are not lying parallel to the supporting table.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".