Automated modeling and robotic grasping of unknown three-dimensional objects
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper describes the development of a novel vision-based modeling and grasping system for three-dimensional (3D) objects whose shape and location are unknown a priori. Our approach integrates online computer vision-based 3D object modeling with online 3D grasp planning and execution. A single wrist-mounted video camera is moved around the stationary object to obtain images from multiple viewpoints. Object silhouettes are extracted from these images and used to form a 3D solid model of the object. To refine the model, the object's top surface is modeled by scanning with a wrist-mounted line laser while recording images. The laser line in each image is used to form a 3D surface model that is combined with the silhouette result. The grasp planning algorithm is designed for the parallel-jaw grippers that are commonly used in industry. The algorithm analyses the solid model, generates a robust force closure grasp, and outputs the required gripper position and orientation for grasping the object. The robot then automatically picks up the object. Experiments are performed with two real-world 3D objects, a metal bracket and a hex nut. The shape, position and orientation of the objects are not known by the system a priori. The time required to compute an object model and plan a grasp was less than 4 s for each object. The experimental results demonstrate that the automated grasping system can obtain suitable models and generate successful grasps, even when the objects are not lying parallel to the supporting table.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it