MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129859993 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2007.4353772

Fast Multichannel Blind System Identification using Laguerre Filters

2007· article· en· W2129859993 on OpenAlexaff
E.J. Dempsey, David T. Westwick

Bibliographic record

VenueConference proceedings · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaguerre polynomialsFinite impulse responseComputer scienceSystem identificationAlgorithmInfinite impulse responseMonte Carlo methodImpulse responseDigital filterChannel (broadcasting)Basis (linear algebra)Identification (biology)Signal processingImpulse (physics)Electronic engineeringMathematicsDigital signal processingData modelingTelecommunicationsEngineeringStatisticsPhysicsBandwidth (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multiple channel blind system identification (MBSI) is often used in applications where the input signal cannot be measured and its statistical properties are unknown. Traditionally, the channel dynamics are modeled using finite impulse response filters. The number of model parameters can be significantly reduced if the filters are expanded onto a suitably chosen expansion basis, such as the discrete Laguerre filters, but several tuning parameters must be chosen correctly. This paper describes an efficient implementation of the Laguerre MBSI technique that allows for the rapid evaluation of many possible basis expansions, and hence tuning parameters. Monte-Carlo simulations compare the performances of the traditional and fast implementations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.744
Threshold uncertainty score0.713

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConference proceedingsSame topicBlind Source Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207