Foraminiferal Distribution in the Central and Western Parts of the Late Pleistocene Champlain Sea Basin, Eastern Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Marine sediments from the late-glacial Champlain Sea have been sampled at 20 localities representing the deeper part of the basin, between Ottawa and the Rivière St-François, Québec. Foraminiferal assemblages have been extracted and a sequence of three deep water and two shallow water ecozones recognized. The lowermost zone (A) is characterized by Cassidulina reniforme, Islandiella helenae and I. norcrossi and represents a paleosalinity of 25 to 30%o. The overlying zone B is dominated by Elphidium excavatum. It represents salinities decreasing from 25 to as low as 10%o. The uppermost zone (C) contains only a sparse assemblage of a morphotype of E. excavatum. If suggests a paleosalinity of no more than 10%o. A mostly unfossiliferous silt and clay layer of variable thickness (post-C) occurs above zone C. It is probably lacustrine. Below zone A and above the Late Wisconsinan till there is a pre-A interval whose variable assemblages represent hyposaline environments east of Montréal, predominantly lacustrine conditions west of Montréal and alternating hyposaline/ lacustrine environments near and south of Montréal. Bottom water temperatures were probably "Arctic" (within a few degrees of 0°) from the pre-A interval up to zone B inclusively. The data from zone C are too poor to estimate temperatures. The shallow water zones indicate environments with high (zone EH) or low (zone EA) salinities but of shallower depths than the deep water zones. The existence of two sequences is interpreted as the result of (probably seasonal) water stratification. The data does not allow to determine the depth of the limit between the shallow and deep waters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".