MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PWE-090 Outcomes of Patients with Ulcerative Colitis who are Azathioprine Tolerant and Azathioprine Intolerant

2013· article· en· W2129925430 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
L Lee, Aslam Syed, George MacFaul, S Lanzon-Miller

Bibliographic record

VenueGut · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAzathioprineMedicineUlcerative colitisInternal medicineThiopurine methyltransferaseGastroenterologyNauseaDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Azathioprine therapy is an immunosuppressive drug that is widely used in the management of ulcerative colitis. 20% of patients with normal TPMT are not able to tolerate the drug and 30% do not respond [1]. For patients who are intolerant to azathioprine, other medicines have been proposed and these include methotrexate, mercaptopurine and infliximab. Methods A cross sectional study was performed using the Milton Keynes Hospital IBD database to compare patients were azathioprine intolerant and those that were azathioprine tolerant. A descriptive analysis of clinical features and outcomes of these two groups was performed. Disease activity scores were based on the montreal classification ranging from S0 (clinical remission) to S3 (severe disease). Results 98 patients were recruited of which 32.7% were intolerant to azathioprine. The median age of azathioprine intolerant patients was 47.5 years and 30.3% were male. In the azathioprine tolerant cohort, the median age was 46 years and 53.0% were male. Azathioprine was not tolerated due to deranged liver function tests in 43.3%, gastrointestinal symptoms of nausea/vomiting in 23.3%, cutaneous side effects in 10.0%, migraines in 6.7% and infections in 3.3%. Abstract PWE-090 Table Azathioprine intolerant (n = 32) Azathioprine tolerant (n = 66) Requiring surgery (%) 6 (18.8) 11 (16.6) Extensive disease (%) 9 (28.1) 24 (36.4) S2/S3 disease (%) 11 (34.4) 19 (28.7) S0/S1 disease (%) 21 (65.6) 47 (71.2) S0 disease- remission (%) 12 (37.5) 30 (45.5) Steroid dependent (%) 9 (28.1) 0 (0.0) Conclusion Azathioprine is a drug that is not tolerated in nearly a third of Ulcerative Colitis patients and this effect demonstrated a sex bias towards females. The most likely reason for azathioprine intolerance was deranged liver function tests, however, intolerable gastrointestinal symptoms are noted. The intolerance of azathioprine is not a prognostic marker that patients will be more likely to undergo colectomy or that their ulcerative colitis will become extensive. However, there is evidence that compared to azathioprine tolerant patients, for every 100 who are intolerant, 8 less will be in remission and 6 will have more severe disease. Finally, we note that prolonged use of low-dose steroids in modern practise is utilised rarely and it is feasible that this trend may lead to increased symptoms at a population level. Disclosure of Interest None Declared. References M. Wahed, J. R. Louis-Auguste, L. M. Baxter, J. K. Limdi, S. A. Mccartney, J. O. Lindsay, and S. L. Bloom, “Efficacy of methotrexate in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis patients unresponsive or intolerant to azathioprine/mercaptopurine,” Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutic s, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 614–620, 2009.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.737

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGutSame topicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchFrench-language works237,207