Bibliographic record
Abstract
La tournure prise récemment par le conflit sur le bois d'oeuvre a donné une impulsion nouvelle et dramatique au débat ayant cours au Canada sur l'avenir de l'Accord de libre‐échange nordaméricain. Dans cet article, Louis Bélanger affirme que cet avenir passe nécessairement par une réforme des institutions créées par l'Accord de 1994. Il montre en quoi la structure institutionnelle actuelle de l'ALENA limite sa portée et le condamne graduellement à la désuétude. Cela n'a pas que des conséquences négatives sur l'efficience et la compétitivité de la zone de libre‐échange nordaméricaine et, donc, du Canada. Le déficit institutionnel dont souffre le traité original crée aussi une dynamique politique désavantageuse pour ce dernier comme pour le Mexique. Pour ces raisons, remodeler l'ALENA—maintenir sa compétitivité et assurer sa viabilité politique—devrait constituer un objectif primordial de la politique étrangère canadienne.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".