MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129950773 · doi:10.1109/med.2011.5983228

Model predictive control of Czochralski crystal growth process

2011· article· en· W2129950773 on OpenAlexaff
James Ng, Stevan Dubljević, Ilyasse Aksikas

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModel predictive controlControl theory (sociology)Linear-quadratic regulatorRepresentation (politics)Partial differential equationState-space representationApplied mathematicsQuadratic equationMathematicsHorizonDistributed parameter systemOptimal controlParabolic partial differential equationMathematical optimizationComputer scienceMathematical analysisControl (management)AlgorithmLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a model predictive control (MPC) formulation for the Czochralski (CZ) crystal growth which is given by the discrete finite-dimensional system representation of a class of parabolic partial differential equations (PDEs) with time-varying features. The motivation behind this work is to address the problem of stabilizing, infinite horizon, linear quadratic regulator synthesis for PDEs with time-dependent parameters which affect the dynamics of the underlying system and appear in the state-space representation. The modal decomposition of the PDE facilitates its approximation by a finite-dimensional linear state-space system. A receding horizon regulator is proposed which incorporates the time-dependence of the PDE parameters and numerical simulations are carried out which demonstrate the optimal stabilization of the process under state and input constraints.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207