MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129967410 · doi:10.1109/tbme.2009.2028876

Wavelet-Domain Medical Image Denoising Using Bivariate Laplacian Mixture Model

2009· article· en· W2129967410 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoise reductionWaveletArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Noise (video)Wavelet transformBivariate analysisMathematicsProbability density functionAlgorithmComputer scienceImage (mathematics)Statistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we proposed novel noise reduction algorithms that can be used to enhance image quality in various medical imaging modalities such as magnetic resonance and multidetector computed tomography. The noisy captured 3-D data are first transformed by discrete complex wavelet transform. Using a nonlinear function, we model the data as the sum of the clean data plus additive Gaussian or Rayleigh noise. We use a mixture of bivariate Laplacian probability density functions for the clean data in the transformed domain. The MAP and minimum mean-squared error (MMSE) estimators allow us to efficiently reduce the noise. The employed prior distribution is mixture and bivariate, and thus accurately characterizes the heavy-tail distribution of clean images and exploits the interscale properties of wavelets coefficients. In addition, we estimate the parameters of the model using local information; as a result, the proposed denoising algorithms are spatially adaptive, i.e., the intrascale dependency of wavelets is also well exploited in the enhancement process. The proposed approach results in significant noise reduction while the introduced distortions are not noticeable as a result of accurate statistical modeling. The obtained shrinkage functions have closed form, are simple in implementation, and efficiently enhances data. Our experiments on CT images show that among our derived shrinkage functions usually BiLapGausMAP produces images with higher peak SNR. However, BiLapGausMMSE is preferred especially for CT images, which have high SNRs. Furthermore, BiLapRayMAP yields better noise reduction performance for low SNR MR datasets such as high-resolution whole heart imaging while BiLapGauMAP results in better performance in MR data with higher intrinsic SNR such as functional cine data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.831
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it