MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129989347 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2006.482

WSN04-1: Deployment for Information Oriented Sensing Coverage in Wireless Sensor Networks

2006· article· en· W2129989347 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobecom · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWireless sensor networkSoftware deploymentComputer scienceKey distribution in wireless sensor networksWirelessMobile wireless sensor networkField (mathematics)Real-time computingComputer networkWireless networkDistributed computingTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to cost constraints and limited sensing capability of sensor nodes, it may be impossible or unrealistic for a wireless sensor network to provide full area coverage in some circumstances. In this paper, we introduce the novel concept of information-oriented sensing coverage, which measures the actual information utility obtained by a wireless sensor network. An information-oriented sensor deployment algorithm is proposed. The algorithm makes use of the fact that in many applications the importance or the information utility at different locations is non-uniform across the sensing field. The effectiveness of the proposed algorithm is studied using simulation. Being a pioneering effort in this area, our work paves a new direction of sensor deployment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.788
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it