KANADA’DA YETİŞEN İKİ Thuja L. (CUPRESSACEAE) TÜRÜNÜN UÇUCU YAĞ KOMPOZİSYONU
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The essential oil needles of Thuja occidentalis L. and Tetraclinis articulate (Vahl) Masters (synonym: Thuja articulate) growing in Canada, were analyzed by HS-SPME / GC-MS technique. Thirty one and fifty one compounds were identified representing 92.30% and 93.42% of the oil, respectively. The main constituents of Thuja occidentalis were bornylacetate (30.00%), limonene (7.56%), camphor (7.33%), α-pinene (7.18%) and δ-cadinene (6.01%), whereas α-pinene (32.67%), 3-carene (18.29%), β-myrcene (11.69%) and bornylacetate (5.88%) were the major constituents of Tetraclinis articulata. The results showed that T. occidentalis chemotype was bornylacetate whereas α-pinene was chemotype of Tetraclinis articulate and HS-SPME method can be applied to routine control analysis of aromatic and medicinal plants
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".