Bibliographic record
Abstract
Over the last few years, new documentaries have come to the world documentary circles. New media, also known as digitally-improved interactive documentaries, are the new players. Representative works are Out My Window, produced by the National Film Board of Canada (NFB) and directed by Katerina Cizek, and Prison Valley, produced by Arte TV and created by French journalists. The interactive documentaries have won a series of prizes in both documentary and media circles as they presented the future of documentaries. However, few studies have been conducted on the convergence of documentary and new media in Korea. What is interactive documentary? What are the key characteristics of them and how are they differentiated from others? What is the ground for calling them as documentary? If they could be called as documentary, what makes this possible? What characteristics do they share with documentaries and what differentiates them from documentaries? To answer these questions, the first step is to theoretically approach the budding cultural phenomenon, and an attempt to critically understand the documentary culture as a tradition. This study is valuable to discuss the future documentary culture that is filled with diversity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".