Bibliographic record
Abstract
Número 117Septiembre - Diciembre 2006ISSN 0041 8633 FEDERALISMO Y DEMOCRACIA Jean-François GAUDREAULT-DESBIENS * Con base en la experiencia canadiense, el autor desarrolla en este artículo una reflexión acerca de la relación existente entre federalismo y democracia. Después de una breve descripción de las principales características del régimen constitucional canadiense, el autor enfoca su atención en dichos conceptos, con el propósito de identificar los valores que pueden ser fomentados por el federalismo. Posteriormente, identifica algunos obstáculos políticos que pudieran impedir la evolución de un sistema federal. Palabras clave: federalismo, democracia, Constitución. * Profesor de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad de Toronto, Canadá. Este artículo fue preparado para el congreso internacional "El orden jurídico de la consolidación democrática", México, D. F., 4 y 5 de octubre de 2004. El autor agradece a la licenciada Gabriela Quintanilla Mendoza por la traducción de la versión original inglesa de este artículo. * Nota: Debido que la traducción es automática podrá ser inexacta o contener errores.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.283 | 0.057 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".