MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2130128029 · doi:10.7202/039290ar

La recherche psychanalytique et la recherche sur les thérapeutiques psychanalytiques. Réflexions d’un psychanalyste et chercheur

2010· article· fr· W2130128029 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Louis Brunet

Bibliographic record

VenueFiligrane Écoutes psychothérapiques · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le texte propose une réflexion sur la recherche en psychanalyse, la recherche sur la psychanalyse et la recherche à partir de la psychanalyse en les différenciant et exposant leurs apports. Il vise aussi à déconstruire certains mythes au sujet des recherches sur l’efficacité thérapeutique et les pratiques validée empiriquement. Le texte propose aussi des repères concernant la place valide de la subjectivité en recherche ainsi que des critères de validité scientifique de la recherche psychanalytique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.041
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.558
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0410.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0040.000
Research integrity0.0120.021
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.433
GPT teacher head0.516
Teacher spread0.083 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFiligrane Écoutes psychothérapiquesSame topicPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207