MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Angioimmunoblastic T-Cell Lymphoma: Clinical Aspects and Recent Advances in Biology and Therapy

2014· article· en· W2130178296 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bernardo Garicochea, Alessandro Leal, Fernando Sérgio Blumm Ferreira, Volney Assis Lara Vilela, Alesso Cervantes Sartorelli, Yana Novis, Paulo M. Hoff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Analytical Oncology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAngioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphomaLymphomaDiseaseEpigeneticsMedicineImmunologyBiologyCancer researchPathologyT cellGeneImmune systemGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) comprehends 20% of the peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL). Although rare, its clinical features may overlap with many other inflammatory, infectious or neoplastic disorders. Therefore, that patients are often diagnosed with advanced stage disease, which contributes for the disease´s dismal prognosis. The clinical presentation of AITL is frequently an assemblage of symptoms including generalized and painful lymphadenopathy, multiple cutaneous alterations, hypergammaglobulinemia, fever, loss of weight and significant autoimmune phenomena. Recent advances in AITL biology have implicated a cell with T-follicular helper phenotype as the origin of the disorder. This rare type of T lymphocyte has a peculiar capacity of interact with microenviroment, which results in an important production of cytokines, explaining the clinical findings of this type of lymphoma. In addition to its pathologic features, AITL can be distinguished from other T-cell lymphomas based on gene expression arrangement, suggesting that AITL has a uniquebiology. Moreover, somatic mutations in the epigenetic regulators DNMT3A, TET2, IDH2, and, especially, in the multifunctional RHOA GTPase gene, have emerged as very consistent genetic abnormalities in AITL. Considering its low incidence, the development of clinical trials in AITL is a challenging matter. Furthermore, the majority of data available originates from studies that contain other subtypes of PTCL, making prognosis analysis and treatment decision a tough work. In this review, we discuss the biological and clinical aspects of AITL and the alternatives for frontline treatment and the management of relapsed disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.361 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Analytical Oncology→Same topicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→