MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2130188633 · doi:10.1191/0961203305lu2043rr

Methotrexate in systemic lupus erythematosus

2005· review· en· W2130188633 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLupus · 2005
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Canadian institutionsArthritis Research Centre of CanadaUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMethotrexateCorticosteroidDiseaseRandomized controlled trialInternal medicineSystemic diseaseCohortLupus erythematosusSystemic lupus erythematosusRetrospective cohort studyClinical trialPrednisoneDermatologyImmunologyAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The most appropriate treatment of moderate, nonorgan threatening disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) remains poorly defined, although methotrexate (MTX) is commonly used. The results of 20 uncontrolled case series and a single retrospective cohort study tend to support its use to treat active skin and joint disease. Unfortunately, three prospective randomized trials have reported conflicting results. Two reported improvement in overall disease activity and decreased corticosteroid requirement with MTX. The third trial showed no benefit from MTX for disease activity, but did report a reduction in corticosteroid requirements. Difficulties in conducting trials in moderately active SLE are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.752
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it