MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2130189124 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2009.5090139

QoS evaluation of a voice over IP network with video: A case study

2009· article· en· W2130189124 on OpenAlexaff
Nick De Cristofaro, Geoff McGill, Afrim Sallahi, Matt Davis, Alla Alsibai, Marc St‐Hilaire

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoice over IPComputer scienceJitterComputer networkCodecQuality of serviceFIFO (computing and electronics)Bandwidth (computing)Queueing theoryLatency (audio)TelecommunicationsThe InternetComputer hardware

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we evaluate the effect of different queueing disciplines and different codecs on a voice over IP (VoIP) network with video (also known as video conference). A real network topology is implemented using Cisco equipment. Experimental results show that low latency queueing (LLQ) and AutoQoS can provide significant improvements over FIFO in terms of delay, jitter and reserved bandwidth for a VoIP call with video. As far as codecs are concerned, they are suitable for different scenarios. It's for certain that G.729 helps when low bandwidth is a must but, without any QoS parameters in place, codecs do not make a good enough difference for acceptable call quality on a congested network.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score0.318

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlFrench-language works237,207