MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2130274633 · doi:10.1080/07055900.2011.605271

Modelling Extreme Storm-Induced Currents over the Grand Banks

2011· article· en· W2130274633 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Yongsheng Wu, Charles Tang, Michael Z. Li, Robert Prescott

Bibliographic record

VenueATMOSPHERE-OCEAN · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicTropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
Canadian institutionsBedford Institute of OceanographyGeological Survey of CanadaFisheries and Oceans Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStormCurrent (fluid)Current meterForcing (mathematics)ClimatologyMeteorologyEnvironmental scienceAtmospheric sciencesGeologyPhysicsOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extreme storm-induced currents over the Grand Banks are investigated using a three-dimensional (3-D) ocean circulation model forced by 22 storms selected from the past 50 years with return intervals ranging from 1 to 34 years. Wind data for the storms are historical atmospheric data. The modelled currents are compared with current meter measurements made during a storm in March 1983. The results indicate good agreement between the model and measurements. In the surface layer of the Grand Banks, the model extreme current speeds are approximately 80 cm s−1 over a large portion of the Grand Banks, and some areas have extreme current speeds higher than 120 cm s−1. The highest extreme current speeds occur at St. Pierre Bank, where the speed reaches 140 cm s−1. In the bottom layer, the region with high extreme current speeds is mainly in the periphery of the Grand Banks, with magnitudes over 40 cm s−1. The results also show that the response of the water to storm forcing in the Grand Banks area varies from place to place because the mechanisms of current generation are different at different locations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueATMOSPHERE-OCEANSame topicTropical and Extratropical Cyclones ResearchFrench-language works237,207