MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2130281184 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2002.5745435

ICA for position and pose measurement from images with occlusion

2002· article· en· W2130281184 on OpenAlex
J. Fortuna, David W. Capson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceComputer visionIndependent component analysisPrincipal component analysisSubspace topologyPosition (finance)Computer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Translation (biology)PoseObject (grammar)OcclusionRepresentation (politics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A method employing independent component analysis (ICA) to measure the position of a camera and the pose of an object from images in the presence of occlusion is presented. ICA is used to provide a low-dimensional representation of a set of images taken throughout a range of camera positions and object poses. Using the low-dimensional independent component subspace arbitrary camera locations or object poses can then be determined. The ICA technique is compared with principal component analysis (PCA) in the presence of varying degrees of occlusion. Occlusions of translation, pan and pose images were experimentally applied to provide a demonstration of the performance of this method. The independent component subspace is shown to provide more accurate position and pose information than PCA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.900
Threshold uncertainty score0.560

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it