MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Do family physicans, emergency physicians and paediatricians give consistent sport-related concussion management advice?

2013· article· en· W2130297140 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jacqueline Stoller, James P. Carson, Laura Purcell, Bruce J. Davidson, Alisha Garel, Margaret Bell, Catherine Snow, Marcus Law

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Sports Medicine · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of GuelphYork UniversityMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConcussionMedicineSpecialtyCognitionPhysical therapyInjury preventionPoison controlFamily medicineMedical emergencyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To identify differences and gaps in the recommendations to patients for the management of sport-related concussion among family physicians (FPs), emergency physicians (ERs) and paediatricians (Peds). Design A self-administered multiple-choice survey, which had been validated for content validity. Setting Toronto East General Hospital and Markham Stouffville Hospital, both in Ontario, Canada. Subjects 270 physicians were invited to participate; 104 surveys were completed (39%). Intervention The survey link was emailed to FPs, ERs and Peds from the above hospitals. Data were analysed using SPSS. Frequencies and percentages were calculated with cross-tabulation of data by specialty. Outcome Measures Key survey questions identified sources of concussion management information, usefulness of concussion diagnosis strategies, and whether physicians use common terminology when explaining cognitive rest strategies to patients after a sport-related concussion. Results For making a diagnosis of concussion, 54% of FPs, 86% of ERs and 78% of Peds never used the SCAT2; 49% of FPs, 57% of ERs and 36% of Peds always advised cognitive rest, the mainstay of early management for post-concussion symptoms; 65% of FPs, 71% of ERs and 55% of Peds always advised physical rest; and 49% of FPs, 52% of ERs and 27% of Peds reported no knowledge of any consensus statements on concussion in sport. Conclusions We identified large gaps in the implementation of recommendations for sport-related concussion patients. Although some physicians are recommending physical and cognitive rest, a large proportion fail to consistently advise this strategy. Better knowledge translation efforts should target all three groups of physicians. Acknowledgements Thank you to Babak Aliarzadeh for the statistical analysis. Special thanks go to Paul Krueger, Leigh Hayden and the other 18 participants in the validation of our survey. Competing interests None.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.089
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.138

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.089
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of Sports MedicineSame topicTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207