Hydrogen peroxide affects abscisic acid binding to ABAP1 in barley aleurones
Post-publication record
Source: Retraction Watch, joined by DOI. OpenAlex records retraction as is_retracted, a boolean over a state space with at least four values, so it cannot express an expression of concern, a correction or a reinstatement; it reports them as false, which reads as “fine”.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dramatic increases in H2O2 levels have been observed following abscisic acid (ABA) treatment of plant tissues. Following ABA treatment in aleurone cells, H2O2 reached transient levels of approximately 115 micromol/L H2O2. To determine whether ABA perception was modified by such changes, the effect of H2O2 on a recently characterized ABA-binding protein (ABAP1), cloned from barley aleurone layers, was examined. ABA binding to the protein was weakened by H2O2 in a concentration-dependent manner. A concentration of 75 micromol/L H2O2 gave a 50% decline in ABA binding in a reaction following first-order kinetics, indicative of binding-site susceptibility to its microenvironment. We monitored the unfolding of ABAP1 using steady-state and time-resolved tryptophan fluorescence, while following the capacity of ABAP1 to bind ABA. ABA binding decreased by 50% following ABAP1 denaturation with 1 mol/L guanidine hydrochloride or 2 mol/L urea, while the maximum emission spectra (lambda emi) red shifted from 338 to 347 nm at 3.5 mol/L guanidine hydrochloride and 5 mol/L urea. However, only a slight blue shift of lambda emi was observed following either ABAP1 incubation with H2O2 or binding to (+)-ABA (physiologically active ABA). The equilibrium ABA dissociation rate accelerated in the presence of 250 micromol/L H2O2, with the half-time dissociation reduced to 8 min. A comparison of inactivation kinetics and conformational changes shows that inactivation of ABAP1 occurs before any noticeable conformational change. This suggests that the ABA binding site is highly responsive to its microenvironment and is situated in a region that is more flexible than the protein molecule as a whole. The results demonstrate that H2O2, generated by ABA treatment of aleurone layers, is sufficient to affect the ABA-binding capacity of ABAP1, suggesting that this may be another level of control of ABA signal transduction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".