Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet essai souligne la valeur programmatique des lectures d’enfance des personnages du Frankenstein (1818) de Mary Shelley, et tout particulièrement les effets de l’exposition de la créature à la lecture de l’essai de C.-F. Volney, Les Ruines (1791). Il montre comment cette lecture renvoie le monstre à une scène primitive problématique et à son statut abhorré de « machine orpheline », fabriquée de fragments humains par un père célibataire. Mais l’auteur analyse aussi comment la ruine est posée comme telos du récit, le monstre se définissant peu à peu, devant l’isolement où il se voit confiné, comme agent ruiniste : celui qui porte la ruine et fait ainsi du créateur un être réduit à ressembler à sa créature. Comparant les signifiants de la ruine chez Volney et Shelley, le texte situe le devenir-monstre de la créature dans les agissements de celle-ci plutôt que dans le bricolage physiologique dont elle est le produit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".