A new multihoming architecture based on overlay network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract According to the deployment of the Internet, the requirement for multihoming connection, intended to improve the accessibility of networks with higher quality or/and robustness, is becoming serious. However, in the existing or legacy multihoming systems, the proposed routing architecture cannot tolerate further increases in the number of multihoming users. Also, although improvement of accessibility when failures occur could be achieved, it is difficult to effectively use several connections by multihoming under normal operating conditions. In this paper, a multihome architecture based on an overlay network is proposed as a new architecture resolving the above problems. By means of the proposed system, improved scalability with respect to the number of users and flexible (policy) control against incoming traffic are applicable, while also achieving improved accessibility under failure conditions, which is one of the main objectives for multihoming. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Electron Comm Jpn Pt 1, 89(5): 41–51, 2006; Published online in Wiley InterScience ( www.interscience.wiley.com ). DOI 10.1002/ecja.20212
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".