MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2130380026 · doi:10.5539/ijef.v6n7p165

Nature of the SME Financing Gap: Some Evidence from Ghana

2014· article· en· W2130380026 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Daniel Domeher, Joseph Magnus Frimpong, Kwame Mreku

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Economics and Finance · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicBanking stability, regulation, efficiency
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConstraint (computer-aided design)AssertionResource constraintsIntervention (counseling)Empirical evidenceEconomicsBusinessDemand sideFinanceMicroeconomicsComputer scienceEnvironmental economicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SMEs are pivotal to economic growth globally. They are however, often said to be constrained by the lack of or limited access to funding. Despite this assertion, the nature of the credit constraint problem is not well known in Ghana especially regarding its various dimensions. Knowing these dimensions is critical to formulating appropriate policies to deal with the problem. The purpose of this paper is to provide empirical evidence on the various dimensions of the credit constraint problem in Ghana. The survey strategy of enquiry was employed based on the adoption of the direct method of determining credit constraints. It was observed amongst other things that the credit constraint is almost entirely a supply-side problem as the demand-side constraint is almost non-existent. It has been recommended amongst other things that intervention policies should focus on the very small business as the incidence and degree of constraint tends to be higher amongst them.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Economics and FinanceSame topicBanking stability, regulation, efficiencyFrench-language works237,207